Vitamins Online v. Heartwise
This text of Vitamins Online v. Heartwise (Vitamins Online v. Heartwise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
VITAMINS ONLINE, INC., MEMORANDUM DECISION Plaintiff, AND ORDER v. Civil No. 2:13-CV-982-DAK HEARTWISE, INC., Judge Dale A. Kimball Defendant.
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Vitamins Online’s Motion to Strike Improper Portions of Defendant’s Status Report and Supporting Evidence [ECF No. 635]. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not generally provide for motions to strike memoranda. See, e.g., Ysais v. New Mexico Jud. Standard Comm’n 616 F. Supp. 2d 1176, 118 (D.N. M. 2009). Instead, such actions are generally preserved for pleadings. See Carvana v. MFG Financial, Inc., 2:07- CV-00128DAK, 2008 WL 4279588, at *1 (D. Utah Sept. 18, 2008). The court requested status updates, and it can, in its own discretion, determine which portions of these reports are relevant and proper. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Improper Portions of Defendant’s Status Report and Supporting Evidence [ECF No. 635] is DENIED.
DATED this 6th day of November 2023. BY THE COURT: “Lt Z K. Lee Dale A. Kimball United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Vitamins Online v. Heartwise, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vitamins-online-v-heartwise-utd-2023.