Vitamin Co. v. Commissioner

21 B.T.A. 311, 1930 BTA LEXIS 1878
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided November 12, 1930·No. Docket No. 24936.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[315]*315OPINION.

Phillips : The assessment and collection of the deficiency are barred by the statute of limitations. Mabel Elevator Co., 2 B. T. A. 517; United States v. Mabel Elevator Co., 17 Fed. (2d) 109; Willingham Loan & Trust Co., 15 B. T. A. 931. Although our decision in the last cited case was reversed by the Circuit Court of Appeals (36 Fed. (2d) 49) our ruling on the point involved was affirmed. The filing of an amended return did not serve as a waiver or to extend the statute. National Refining Co., 1 B. T. A. 236; United States v. National Refining Co., 21 Fed. (2d). 464. In view of the above it is not necessary to discuss the second error.

Decision will he entered for the petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vitamin Co. v. Commissioner, 21 B.T.A. 311, 1930 BTA LEXIS 1878 (bta 1930).

21 B.T.A. 311 (Vitamin Co. v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Klemp v. Commissioner
77 T.C. 201 (U.S. Tax Court, 1981)
Vitamin Co. v. Commissioner
21 B.T.A. 311 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1930)