Vitale v. Woodhouse

270 A.D.2d 951, 706 N.Y.S.2d 292, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3560
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 29, 2000·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly confirmed the determination denying the application of petitioner for medical assistance on the ground that her available resources exceed financial eligibility standards. Under the terms of the irrevocable trust created by petitioner in 1986, the trustees “are authorized in their sole and absolute discretion at any time” to make payments from the trust corpus for the benefit of petitioner. Thus, in determining petitioner’s financial eligibility, the trust corpus was properly considered a resource available to petitioner (see,

[952] Social Services Law § 366 [2] [b] [2] [ii]; 18 NYCRR 360-4.5 [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Livingston County, Cicoria, J. — CPLR art 78.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Wisner, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vitale v. Woodhouse, 270 A.D.2d 951, 706 N.Y.S.2d 292, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3560 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

270 A.D.2d 951 (Vitale v. Woodhouse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Pugliese v. Zucker
2019 NY Slip Op 7159 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
FLANNERY, FRANCES v. ZUCKER, M.D., HOWARD Z.
136 A.D.3d 1285 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Sunrise Manor Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation ex rel. Gronert v. Novello
19 A.D.3d 426 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)