Vitale v. Natalino

Connecticut Appellate Court

Vitale v. Natalino

478 A.2d 270, 2 Conn. App. 345

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedMay 10, 1984

Docket(2919)

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 478 A.2d 270 (Vitale v. Natalino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vitale v. Natalino, 478 A.2d 270, 2 Conn. App. 345 (Colo. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff 1 filed this appeal 2 following a trial in which the jury found against the plaintiffs on each of the five counts in their complaint.

The parties did not appear for oral argument, but stipulated that the court may rule on the basis of the record and briefs. After a careful study of the record and briefs of those issues properly before this court, we conclude that there is no merit to the plaintiffs claims.

There is no error.

1

The original suit included both Louis Vitale and Andres Rodriguez as the plaintiffs. Rodriguez was nonsuited and failed to appeal the nonsuit. For the purposes of this appeal, Vitale is the sole plaintiff.

2

This appeal, originally filed in the Supreme Court, was transferred to this court. Public Acts, Spec. Sess., June, 1983, No. 83-29, § 2 (c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI