Vitale v. Hagan
This text of 524 N.E.2d 144 (Vitale v. Hagan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[957]*957OPINION OF THE COURT
Order modified, with costs to defendant City of New York against plaintiff, by dismissing the cause of action for malicious prosecution only as against defendant city for the reasons stated in so much of the dissenting memorandum of Presiding Justice Francis T. Murphy, Jr., at the Appellate Division (132 AD2d 468, 470-472) as relates to the untimely and thus invalid notice of claim and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to plaintiff against defendant Hagan.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
524 N.E.2d 144, 71 N.Y.2d 955, 528 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vitale-v-hagan-ny-1988.