Vitagraph Co. of America v. Schuettler

Appellate Court of Illinois

Vitagraph Co. of America v. Schuettler

209 Ill. App. 595

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided March 12, 1918·No. Gen. No. 28,561·Published

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Mandamus—u>hat not proper practice as to time for passing upon motion for appeal from judgment granting > writ. On a petition for a writ of mandamus, it is not in accordance with practice or the spirit of the law for the court to defer passing upon a duly-presented motion for appeal from a judgment granting the writ until after the writ has issued.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Mandamus—u>hat not proper practice as to time for passing upon motion for appeal from judgment granting > writ. On a petition for a writ of mandamus, it is not in accordance with practice or the spirit of the law for the court to defer passing upon a duly-presented motion for appeal from a judgment granting the writ until after the writ has issued.

Vitagraph Co. of America v. Schuettler, 209 Ill. App. 595 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

209 Ill. App. 595 (Vitagraph Co. of America v. Schuettler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.