Vitagraph Co. of America v. Schuettler

Appellate Court of Illinois

Vitagraph Co. of America v. Schuettler

209 Ill. App. 595

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMarch 12, 1918

DocketGen. No. 28,561

StatusPublished

This text of 209 Ill. App. 595 (Vitagraph Co. of America v. Schuettler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vitagraph Co. of America v. Schuettler, 209 Ill. App. 595 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Mandamus—u>hat not proper practice as to time for passing upon motion for appeal from judgment granting > writ. On a petition for a writ of mandamus, it is not in accordance with practice or the spirit of the law for the court to defer passing upon a duly-presented motion for appeal from a judgment granting the writ until after the writ has issued.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Mandamus—u>hat not proper practice as to time for passing upon motion for appeal from judgment granting > writ. On a petition for a writ of mandamus, it is not in accordance with practice or the spirit of the law for the court to defer passing upon a duly-presented motion for appeal from a judgment granting the writ until after the writ has issued.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 Ill. App. 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vitagraph-co-of-america-v-schuettler-illappct-1918.