Vita S Shannon v. Aron L Ralston

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 2020·No. 161269·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

May 15, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

161268-9 & (54)(55) David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra VITA S. SHANNON, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellant, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 161268-9 COA: 350094; 350110 Oakland CC Family Div: 2017-852916-DC ARON L. RALSTON, Defendant-Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 12, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. May 15, 2020 b0512 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vita S Shannon v. Aron L Ralston, (Mich. 2020).

Vita S Shannon v. Aron L Ralston (Vita S Shannon v. Aron L Ralston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.