Visusil v. W. T. Grant Co.
This text of 253 A.D. 736 (Visusil v. W. T. Grant Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Aption brought in the County Court of Nassau county for damages for breach of an implied warranty that candy purchased from appellant by respondent, through the agency of the latter’s wife, was fit for consumption as food. Plaintiff recovered judgment' for his damages for the breach. From that judgment defendant appeals. Judgment in favor of plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Ryan v. Progressive Grocery Stores, 255 N. Y. 388, 390.) Present — Hagarty, Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
253 A.D. 736, 300 N.Y.S. 652, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/visusil-v-w-t-grant-co-nyappdiv-1937.