Visual Equities Inc. v. Sotheby's, Inc.
This text of 199 A.D.2d 59 (Visual Equities Inc. v. Sotheby's, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam Altman, J.), entered July 6, 1993, which modified an order entered July 2, 1993, requiring plaintiff to post a $1 million undertaking as a condition of continuing a temporary restraining order preventing Sotheby’s from delivering an original print of the Declaration of Independence to Kaller Historical Documents ("Kaller”), unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion to the extent of reducing the undertaking to the amount of $278,500, with costs. Appeal from the order of said court and Justice, entered July 2, 1993, unanimously dismissed as super-ceded by the appeal from the aforesaid order, without costs.
The undertaking should be reduced to reflect those damages defendant may incur if the court determines that the preliminary injunction was erroneously granted (Margolies v Encounter, Inc., 42 NY2d 475; CPLR 6312 [b]). The IAS Court’s consideration of Kaller’s possible damages from plaintiff’s refusal to sell its copy of the Declaration of Independence was speculative since no showing was made of any damages Kaller may incur. (Compare, Cross Props. v Brook Realty Co., 76 AD2d 445; McClosky v Long Is. Hockey Club, 18 AD2d 1023.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Ross and Nardelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
199 A.D.2d 59, 604 N.Y.S.2d 117, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/visual-equities-inc-v-sothebys-inc-nyappdiv-1993.