Visual Electronics Corp. v. Morcheles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Visual Electronics Corp. v. Morcheles

54 A.D.2d 635, 387 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14131

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 14, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 635 (Visual Electronics Corp. v. Morcheles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Visual Electronics Corp. v. Morcheles, 54 A.D.2d 635, 387 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 9, 1976, granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint for the reason that the causes alleged are barred by the plea of res judicata and collateral estoppel, unanimously affirmed with $60 costs and disbursements to respondents. This affirmance is predicated upon the reasons stated in the memorandum decision of Nadel, J., with the further observation that after a trial, the New Jersey Superior Court held, inter alia, that there was no material mistake of fact with respect to the settlement agreement of February 28, 1972. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Murphy, Lupiano, Lane and Yesawich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 9, 1976, granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint for the reason that the causes alleged are barred by the plea of res judicata and collateral estoppel, unanimously affirmed with $60 costs and disbursements to respondents. This affirmance is predicated upon the reasons stated in the memorandum decision of Nadel, J., with the further observation that after a trial, the New Jersey Superior Court held, inter alia, that there was no material mistake of fact with respect to the settlement agreement of February 28, 1972. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Murphy, Lupiano, Lane and Yesawich, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 635, 387 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/visual-electronics-corp-v-morcheles-nyappdiv-1976.