Visual Electronics Corp. v. Morcheles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Visual Electronics Corp. v. Morcheles

54 A.D.2d 635, 387 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14131

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 14, 1976·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 9, 1976, granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint for the reason that the causes alleged are barred by the plea of res judicata and collateral estoppel, unanimously affirmed with $60 costs and disbursements to respondents. This affirmance is predicated upon the reasons stated in the memorandum decision of Nadel, J., with the further observation that after a trial, the New Jersey Superior Court held, inter alia, that there was no material mistake of fact with respect to the settlement agreement of February 28, 1972. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Murphy, Lupiano, Lane and Yesawich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 9, 1976, granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint for the reason that the causes alleged are barred by the plea of res judicata and collateral estoppel, unanimously affirmed with $60 costs and disbursements to respondents. This affirmance is predicated upon the reasons stated in the memorandum decision of Nadel, J., with the further observation that after a trial, the New Jersey Superior Court held, inter alia, that there was no material mistake of fact with respect to the settlement agreement of February 28, 1972. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Murphy, Lupiano, Lane and Yesawich, JJ.

Visual Electronics Corp. v. Morcheles, 54 A.D.2d 635, 387 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

54 A.D.2d 635 (Visual Electronics Corp. v. Morcheles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.