Vista Healthplan, Inc. v. HCA, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vista Healthplan, Inc. v. HCA, Inc.

861 So. 2d 102, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19211, 2003 WL 22956958

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 17, 2003

DocketNo. 4D03-3747

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 861 So. 2d 102 (Vista Healthplan, Inc. v. HCA, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vista Healthplan, Inc. v. HCA, Inc., 861 So. 2d 102, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19211, 2003 WL 22956958 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION TO STAY ARBITRATION

PENDING APPEAL

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, in this non-final appeal of an order requiring arbitration, seek review of the trial court’s order denying their motion to stay arbitration pending the outcome of this appeal. The only reason they give for staying arbitration is that the time and expense of arbitration will have been wasted if we reverse the order requiring arbitration.

Section 682.03(3), Florida Statutes (2003) provides that any action involving an issue subject to arbitration shall be stayed if arbitration has been ordered. It is thus our policy, as expressed by the legislature, that, once arbitration is ordered, arbitration proceeds and the lawsuit does not. The only reason advanced for staying the arbitration in this case, to save time and expense, would apply in every ease, and staying the arbitration for that reason would be contrary to section 682.03(3). We accordingly deny review of the order denying a stay pending appeal.

STONE, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION TO STAY ARBITRATION

PENDING APPEAL

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, in this non-final appeal of an order requiring arbitration, seek review of the trial court’s order denying their motion to stay arbitration pending the outcome of this appeal. The only reason they give for staying arbitration is that the time and expense of arbitration will have been wasted if we reverse the order requiring arbitration.

Section 682.03(3), Florida Statutes (2003) provides that any action involving an issue subject to arbitration shall be stayed if arbitration has been ordered. It is thus our policy, as expressed by the legislature, that, once arbitration is ordered, arbitration proceeds and the lawsuit does not. The only reason advanced for staying the arbitration in this case, to save time and expense, would apply in every ease, and staying the arbitration for that reason would be contrary to section 682.03(3). We accordingly deny review of the order denying a stay pending appeal.

STONE, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

861 So. 2d 102, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19211, 2003 WL 22956958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vista-healthplan-inc-v-hca-inc-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack