Vista Healthplan, Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

266 F. Supp. 2d 44, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9557, 2003 WL 21287614
CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedJune 4, 2003
DocketCIVA101CV01295EGSAK
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 266 F. Supp. 2d 44 (Vista Healthplan, Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vista Healthplan, Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 266 F. Supp. 2d 44, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9557, 2003 WL 21287614 (D.D.C. 2003).

Opinion

ORDER CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS AND PRELIMINARILYAP-PROVING PROPOSED SETTLEMENTS

SULLIVAN, District Judge.

Upon review and consideration of the: (i) Stipulation of Settlement dated May 27, 2003, executed on behalf of Plaintiff Vista Healthplan, Inc., individually, and as representative of the Settlement Class (as defined below), and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; and (ii) Stipulation of Settlement Dated May 27, 2003, executed on behalf of Plaintiff Vista Healthplan, Inc., individually, and as representative of the Settlement Class, and American BioScience, Inc. (collectively, the “Settlement Agreements”), and having held a hearing on June 3, 2003, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

Preliminary Approval of Settlements and Conditional Certification of the Settlement Class

1. The Court finds that it has jurisdiction over this Action.

2. The terms of the Settlement Agreements are preliminarily approved, subject to further consideration at the Fairness Hearing provided for below. The Court finds that the settlements reached in the Settlement Agreements are sufficiently within the range of reasonableness so that notice of the proposes settlements should be given as provided below in paragraphs 6 through 9.

3. The Court conditionally certifies the following Settlement Class (“Class”):

All “Third-Party Payors” (defined immediately below) in the United States which, at any time from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2002, paid, in whole or in part, for Taxol and/or generic paclitaxel in the United States. Excluded from the Class are Defendants, their subsidiaries, affiliates, officers and directors, and government entities.
“Third-Party Payor” shall mean any entity that (i) is a party to a contract, issuer of a policy, or sponsor of a plan, which contract, policy or plan provides coverage for the administration of Taxol or generic paclitaxel to natural persons, and (ii) is also at risk, pursuant to such contract, policy or plan, to pay or reim *45 burse all or part of the costs of providing such coverage.
A self-funded health benefit plan for employees of a government entity that satisfies the definition of “Third-Party Payor” shall not be considered a “government entity.”

4. The Court conditionally finds that Vista Healthplan, Inc. is an adequate class representative for the Class. If the Settlement Agreements are terminated or are not consummated for any reasons whatsoever, the certification of the Class shall be void, and the defendants shall have reserved all of their rights to oppose any and all class certification motions and to contest the adequacy of Vista Healthplan, Inc. as a representative of any putative class.

5. The Court appoints, consistent -with prior orders, Hanzman & Criden, P.A., as lead counsel for the Class (“Lead Counsel”).

Notice to Potential Class Members

6. Before or on June 20, 2003 (or 17 calendar days after entry of this Order), Lead Counsel shall direct the Claims Administrator (defined below) to mail by first class mail, postage prepaid, copies of the Notice of Proposed Settlement and Settlement Hearing (“Notice”), substantially in the form attached as Exhibit 3 to Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval, to all potential members of the Class, to the extent that they can be identified by reasonable diligence.

7. Lead Counsel shall also direct the Claims Administrator to have published a Summary Notice of Proposed Settlement and Settlement Hearing (“Summary Notice”), substantially in the form attached as Exhibit 4 * to Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval: (i) one day a week for two consecutive weeks in National Underwriter: Life & Health/Financial Services Edition; and (ii) one day a week for two consecutive weeks in the New York Times. Summary Notice shall be first published as soon as practicable after entry of this Order, and in all events, before June 30, 2003.

8. Prior to the Fairness Hearing, Lead Counsel shall file with the Court a sworn statement attesting to compliance with the provisions of paragraphs 6 & 7 above.

9. The notice to be provided to potential class members as set forth in paragraphs 6 & 7 above is found to be the best means of providing notice practicable under the circumstances and, when completed, shall constitute due and sufficient notice of the proposed settlement and the Fairness Hearing to all persons affected by and/or entitled to participate in the settlements reached by the parties, in full compliance with the notice requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of CM Procedure and due process.

Claims Administration

10. Lead Counsel has designated Complete Claim Solutions as the Claims Administrator, which designation is hereby approved, to be responsible for: (i) establishing an address and toll-free phone number (to be included in the Notice and Summary Notice) to communicate with Class members; (ii) establishing a website to post the Notice, Summary Notice and Settlement Agreements and related documents; (in) disseminating Notice to Class Members; (iv) receiving and maintaining documents sent from Class Members, including Proofs of Claim, Notices of exclusions, and other documents relating to claims administration; and (v) administrating claims for allocation of funds among Class Members consistent with the Settle *46 ment Agreements, Escrow Agreements and Court Order.

11. The Escrow Agent is directed to pay the Settlement Administrator the costs of the notice ordered by the Court consistent with the Escrow Agreements entered into by the parties.

Requests for Exclusion From the Class

12. Any member of the Class who wishes to be excluded from the Class shall mail a written request for exclusion (“Notice of Exclusion”) to the Claims Administrator, to be mailed and received no later than August 20, 2003, and clearly stating the following: the name, address, taxpayer identification number, telephone number and fax number of the entity that wishes to be excluded from the Class. The Notice of Exclusion shall include, among other things, a certification containing substantially the following language: “The undersigned hereby represents that he/she has authority to sign and submit this Notice of Exclusion on behalf of the above-named Third-Party Payor, and that information provided herein is based on company records kept in the ordinary course of business. The undersigned also certifies that he/she has not received any advice from the parties to this litigation concerning his/her or the Third-Party Payor’s fiduciary obligations under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1100, et seq., or other laws governing their obligations to any class member. The undersigned understands that by submitting this Notice of Exclusion, the Third-Party Payor identified above will not be entitled to receive any proceeds of the Settlements described more fully in the Notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trombley v. National City Bank
759 F. Supp. 2d 20 (District of Columbia, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 F. Supp. 2d 44, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9557, 2003 WL 21287614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vista-healthplan-inc-v-bristol-myers-squibb-co-dcd-2003.