Visser v. Visser
This text of 2021 ND 231 (Visser v. Visser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT DECEMBER 23, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2021 ND 231
Alexandra Visser, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Joshua Visser, Defendant and Appellant and State of North Dakota Statutory Real Party in Interest
No. 20210151
Appeal from the District Court of Richland County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Bradley A. Cruff, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Tracey R. Lindberg, Pelican Rapids, MN, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Jeffrey Sprout, Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. Visser v. Visser No. 20210151
[¶1] Joshua Visser appeals from a district court order denying his motion to modify primary residential responsibility for the child he has with Alexandra Visser. Joshua Visser argues the district court erred in denying his motion because there was evidence of several material changes in circumstance and the court’s findings under the best interest factors are clearly erroneous. We conclude the district court’s decision is not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2021 ND 231, 968 N.W.2d 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/visser-v-visser-nd-2021.