Vision Bank v. Avery
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
VISION BANK, Special Administrator of ) the Estate of Christopher Shawn Poor, ) Deceased, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. CIV-22-602-R ) CHANCE AVERY, and ) THE CITY OF THE VILLAGE, ) ) Defendants. )
ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Avery’s unopposed Motion [Doc. No. 125] seeking a stay pending his appeal from the Order of September 5, 2025, which denied his motion for summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity. An interlocutory appeal from an order denying summary judgment on the issue of qualified immunity “divests the district court of jurisdiction to proceed with any part of the action against [the] appealing defendant.” Stewart v. Donges, 915 F.2d 572, 576 (10th Cir. 1990). For this reason, and because Plaintiff and co-defendant City of the Village do not object to the requested stay, the motion is GRANTED. All further proceedings in this case are stayed until Defendant Avery’s appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is concluded. When the mandate is received, the stay will be automatically lifted, and the case will be reopened. IT IS SO ORDERED this 9" day of September, 2025.
DAVID L. RUSSELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vision Bank v. Avery (Vision Bank v. Avery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.