Visintine v. Atkinson

646 F. App'x 328
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 25, 2016·No. No. 15-7905·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Steven Visintine, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) [329]*329petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Visintine v. Atkinson, No. 5:15-hc-02055-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 16, 2015). We deny Visin-tine’s motion for injunctive relief pending appeal, but we grant his motion to supplement his informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Visintine v. Atkinson, 646 F. App'x 328 (4th Cir. 2016).

646 F. App'x 328 (Visintine v. Atkinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related