Vishino v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vishino v. State

765 So. 2d 848, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10369, 2000 WL 1153558

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 16, 2000

DocketNo. 4D00-2407

StatusPublished

This text of 765 So. 2d 848 (Vishino v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vishino v. State, 765 So. 2d 848, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10369, 2000 WL 1153558 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mary Vishino appeals the denial of her motion to correct illegal sentence, in which she argued that she was entitled to post-conviction relief from her conviction for trafficking in hydrocodone under Hayes v. State, 750 So.2d 1 (Fla.1999). We affirm without prejudice to file a timely, properly sworn post-conviction motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure [849]*8493.850(b)(2). See Klayman v. State, 765 So.2d 784 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

In that new motion, appellant may also present her argument for relief under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). We decline to address that claim since it was raised for the first time in this appeal.

GUNTHER, STONE and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mary Vishino appeals the denial of her motion to correct illegal sentence, in which she argued that she was entitled to post-conviction relief from her conviction for trafficking in hydrocodone under Hayes v. State, 750 So.2d 1 (Fla.1999). We affirm without prejudice to file a timely, properly sworn post-conviction motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure [849]*8493.850(b)(2). See Klayman v. State, 765 So.2d 784 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

In that new motion, appellant may also present her argument for relief under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). We decline to address that claim since it was raised for the first time in this appeal.

GUNTHER, STONE and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

765 So. 2d 848, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10369, 2000 WL 1153558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vishino-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack