VISCUSO, ANGELO M. v. VISCUSO, SUSAN M.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in VISCUSO, ANGELO M. v. VISCUSO, SUSAN M.. Read the opinion of the Court — 129 A.D.3d 1679
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 19, 2015·No. CAF 14-00342·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

802 CAF 14-00342 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF ANGELO M. VISCUSO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SUSAN M. VISCUSO, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

BOUVIER PARTNERSHIP, LLP, BUFFALO (EMILIO COLAIACOVO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

FRANCINE E. MODICA, TONAWANDA, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Paul G. Buchanan, J.), entered December 18, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order directed respondent to pay petitioner’s attorney the sum of $12,500 in counsel fees.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Viscuso v Viscuso ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [June 19, 2015]).

Entered: June 19, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VISCUSO, ANGELO M. v. VISCUSO, SUSAN M., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

VISCUSO, ANGELO M. v. VISCUSO, SUSAN M. (VISCUSO, ANGELO M. v. VISCUSO, SUSAN M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.