Viscotti v. Woodford
This text of Viscotti v. Woodford (Viscotti v. Woodford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHN LOUIS VISCIOTTI, Nos. 99-99031 Petitioner-Appellee- 99-99032 Cross-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-97-04591-R Central District JILL BROWN, Warden, of California State Prison at San Quentin,* of California, Respondent-Appellant- Los Angeles Cross-Appellee. ORDER
ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Filed May 9, 2005
Before: Harry Pregerson, A. Wallace Tashima, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Given the facts, the circumstances, and the record in this case, we deny Petitioner’s Motion for Oral Argument on Post Remand Briefing and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Woodford v. Visciotti, 537 U.S. 19 (2002). We express no opinion on any of the arguments offered by the parties in their post-remand briefing, as the
*Jill Brown is substituted for Jeanne Woodford, her predecessor as Warden of San Quentin State Prison. See Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).
5003 5004 VISCIOTTI v. BROWN proper course would be for the district court to review and rule on the arguments in the first instance.
IT IS SO ORDERED. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2005 Thomson/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Viscotti v. Woodford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/viscotti-v-woodford-ca9-2005.