Visciotti v. Brown
This text of 406 F.3d 1131 (Visciotti v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
406 F.3d 1131
John Louis VISCIOTTI, Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,
v.
Jill BROWN, Warden, of California State Prison at San Quentin,* Respondent-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.
No. 99-99031.
No. 99-99032.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 9, 2005.
Maria E. Stratton, Esq., William Forman, Statia Peakheart, Esq., Federal Public Defender's Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.
Meagan J. Beale, Esq., John T. Swan, DAG, Office of the California Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Respondent-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.
Before: PREGERSON, TASHIMA, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Given the facts, the circumstances, and the record in this case, we deny Petitioner's Motion for Oral Argument on Post Remand Briefing and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Woodford v. Visciotti, 537 U.S. 19, 123 S.Ct. 357, 154 L.Ed.2d 279 (2002). We express no opinion on any of the arguments offered by the parties in their post-remand briefing, as the proper course would be for the district court to review and rule on the arguments in the first instance.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
406 F.3d 1131, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 8063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/visciotti-v-brown-ca9-2005.