Visciotti v. Brown

406 F.3d 1131, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 8063
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 9, 2005
Docket99-99031
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 406 F.3d 1131 (Visciotti v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Visciotti v. Brown, 406 F.3d 1131, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 8063 (9th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

406 F.3d 1131

John Louis VISCIOTTI, Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,
v.
Jill BROWN, Warden, of California State Prison at San Quentin,* Respondent-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.

No. 99-99031.

No. 99-99032.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 9, 2005.

Maria E. Stratton, Esq., William Forman, Statia Peakheart, Esq., Federal Public Defender's Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.

Meagan J. Beale, Esq., John T. Swan, DAG, Office of the California Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Respondent-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.

Before: PREGERSON, TASHIMA, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Given the facts, the circumstances, and the record in this case, we deny Petitioner's Motion for Oral Argument on Post Remand Briefing and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Woodford v. Visciotti, 537 U.S. 19, 123 S.Ct. 357, 154 L.Ed.2d 279 (2002). We express no opinion on any of the arguments offered by the parties in their post-remand briefing, as the proper course would be for the district court to review and rule on the arguments in the first instance.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Notes:

*

Jill Brown is substituted for Jeanne Woodford, her predecessor as Warden of San Quentin State PrisonSee Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Visciotti v. Martel
862 F.3d 749 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
406 F.3d 1131, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 8063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/visciotti-v-brown-ca9-2005.