Viscioso v. Manz

756 So. 2d 238, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4802, 2000 WL 485557
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 26, 2000
DocketNo. 3D99-2082
StatusPublished

This text of 756 So. 2d 238 (Viscioso v. Manz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Viscioso v. Manz, 756 So. 2d 238, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4802, 2000 WL 485557 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Zeidwig v. Ward, 548 So.2d 209 (Fla.1989)(where court determined . that criminal defendant received effective assistance of counsel,, defendant/attorney in subsequent civil malprac[239]*239tice action may defensively assert collateral estoppel); State v. Viscioso, 709 So.2d 650 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(affirming on appeal and cross appeal order granting Rule 3.850 relief); Johnson v. Raban, 702 S.W.2d 134, 138 (Mo.App.E.D.1985)(effective administration of justice would be undermined if prior decision on same issue is ignored).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zeidwig v. Ward
548 So. 2d 209 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Johnson v. Raban
702 S.W.2d 134 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1985)
State v. Viscioso
709 So. 2d 650 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
756 So. 2d 238, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4802, 2000 WL 485557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/viscioso-v-manz-fladistctapp-2000.