Viscioso v. Manz

756 So. 2d 238, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4802, 2000 WL 485557
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 26, 2000·No. No. 3D99-2082·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Zeidwig v. Ward, 548 So.2d 209 (Fla.1989)(where court determined . that criminal defendant received effective assistance of counsel,, defendant/attorney in subsequent civil malprac[239] tice action may defensively assert collateral estoppel); State v. Viscioso, 709 So.2d 650 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(affirming on appeal and cross appeal order granting Rule 3.850 relief); Johnson v. Raban, 702 S.W.2d 134, 138 (Mo.App.E.D.1985)(effective administration of justice would be undermined if prior decision on same issue is ignored).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Viscioso v. Manz, 756 So. 2d 238, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4802, 2000 WL 485557 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

756 So. 2d 238 (Viscioso v. Manz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zeidwig v. Ward
548 So. 2d 209 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Johnson v. Raban
702 S.W.2d 134 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1985)
State v. Viscioso
709 So. 2d 650 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)