Viscardi v. Viscardi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Viscardi v. Viscardi

175 A.D.2d 123, 573 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9780

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 1, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 175 A.D.2d 123 (Viscardi v. Viscardi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Viscardi v. Viscardi, 175 A.D.2d 123, 573 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9780 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Smith, J.), dated October 17, 1989, which, after a hearing, (1) granted the defendant wife’s motion to hold him in contempt for his willful failure to comply with a prior order of the same court, dated May 16, 1989, which awarded the defendant wife maintenance and child support pendente lite, and (2) directed that the appellant be incarcerated for a period of 30 days unless he paid arrears of $7,450.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We find that, under the circumstances, the court did not err in finding the plaintiff in contempt. Lawrence, J. P., Fiber, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Smith, J.), dated October 17, 1989, which, after a hearing, (1) granted the defendant wife’s motion to hold him in contempt for his willful failure to comply with a prior order of the same court, dated May 16, 1989, which awarded the defendant wife maintenance and child support pendente lite, and (2) directed that the appellant be incarcerated for a period of 30 days unless he paid arrears of $7,450.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We find that, under the circumstances, the court did not err in finding the plaintiff in contempt. Lawrence, J. P., Fiber, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 A.D.2d 123, 573 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/viscardi-v-viscardi-nyappdiv-1991.