Visa Inc. v. Osborn

137 S. Ct. 289, 196 L. Ed. 2d 396, 85 U.S.L.W. 3245, 2016 WL 6808590, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 6921
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 17, 2016·No. Nos. 15–961; 15–962.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

These cases were granted to resolve "[w]hether allegations that members of a business association agreed to adhere to the association's rules and possess governance rights in the association, without more, are sufficient to plead the element of conspiracy in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act...." Pet. for Cert. in No. 15-961, p. i, and No. 15-962, p. i. After "[h]aving persuaded us to grant certiorari" on this issue, however, petitioners "chose to rely on a different argument" in their merits briefing. City and County of San Francisco v. Sheehan , 575 U.S. ----, ----, 135 S.Ct. 1765, 1772, 191 L.Ed.2d 856 (2015). The Court, therefore, orders that *290the writs in these cases be dismissed as improvidently granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Visa Inc. v. Osborn, 137 S. Ct. 289, 196 L. Ed. 2d 396, 85 U.S.L.W. 3245, 2016 WL 6808590, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 6921 (U.S. 2016).

137 S. Ct. 289 (Visa Inc. v. Osborn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Madison v. Alabama
586 U.S. 265 (Supreme Court, 2019)
Collins Nyabwa v. Corrections Corp. of America
703 F. App'x 355 (Fifth Circuit, 2017)
McWilliams v. Dunn
582 U.S. 183 (Supreme Court, 2017)
Jiggetts v. District of Columbia
319 F.R.D. 408 (D.C. Circuit, 2017)