Virtue v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Retirement & Family Protection Plan

584 F. App'x 3
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided November 18, 2014·No. No. 13-7194·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court [4]*4for the District of Columbia and on the briefs of the parties and oral arguments of counsel. The court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. R. 36(d). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed.

Daniel Virtue appeals the District Court’s rulings denying class certification and granting summary judgment to the defendants. We affirm because we agree, for the reasons stated by the District Court, that Virtue’s claims are time-barred. Virtue v. Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters Ret. & Family Prot. Plan, 997 F.Supp.2d 10 (D.D.C.2013).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. R. 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Virtue v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Retirement & Family Protection Plan, 584 F. App'x 3 (D.C. Cir. 2014).

584 F. App'x 3 (Virtue v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Retirement & Family Protection Plan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untalasco v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
249 F. Supp. 3d 318 (District of Columbia, 2017)