Vironment
This text of 1999 SD 43 (Vironment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Formatting provided courtesy of State Bar of South Dakota
and South Dakota Continuing Legal Education, Inc.
222 East Capitol Ave.
Pierre, SD 57501-2596
VIRONMENT, INC.,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
CHARLES E. LIGHT,
Defendant and Appellee.
[1999 SD 43]
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from the First Judicial Circuit, Yankton County, SD
Hon. Lee A. Tappe, Judge
#20557--Reversed
Dennis C. McFarland, Sioux Falls, SD
Attorney for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Timothy L. James, James & Associates, Yankton, SD
Attorneys for Defendant and Appellee.
Considered on Briefs Jan 14, 1999; Opinion Filed Apr 7, 1999
AMUNDSON, Justice.
[¶1] This is a companion case to Yankton Ethanol v. Vironment, 1999 SD 42, the cases involve identical facts and two identical issues:
1. Whether the court erred in dismissing plaintiff's complaint as barred by the period of limitation set forth in 11 USCS 546 (a)(1)(A).
2. Whether the court erred in granting the amended motion to dismiss based upon SDCL 47-7-50.
As to these issues, our decision in Yankton Ethanol controls the motion to dismiss in this case. Therefore, this case is also reversed and remanded
[¶2] MILLER, Chief Justice, SABERS, KONENKAMP, and GILBERTSON, Justices, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1999 SD 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vironment-sd-1999.