Vironment

1999 SD 43
South Dakota Supreme Court·Decided April 7, 1999·No. None·Published

Opinion

Unified Judicial System

Formatting provided courtesy of State Bar of South Dakota
and South Dakota Continuing Legal Education, Inc.
222 East Capitol Ave.
Pierre, SD 57501-2596


VIRONMENT, INC.,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
CHARLES E. LIGHT,

Defendant and Appellee.
[1999 SD 43]

South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from the First Judicial Circuit, Yankton County, SD
Hon. Lee A. Tappe, Judge
#20557--Reversed

Dennis C. McFarland, Sioux Falls, SD
Attorney for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Timothy L. James, James & Associates, Yankton, SD
Attorneys for Defendant and Appellee.

Considered on Briefs Jan 14, 1999; Opinion Filed Apr 7, 1999

AMUNDSON, Justice.

[¶1] This is a companion case to Yankton Ethanol v. Vironment, 1999 SD 42, the cases involve identical facts and two identical issues:

1. Whether the court erred in dismissing plaintiff's complaint as barred by the period of limitation set forth in 11 USCS 546 (a)(1)(A).

2. Whether the court erred in granting the amended motion to dismiss based upon SDCL 47-7-50.

As to these issues, our decision in Yankton Ethanol controls the motion to dismiss in this case. Therefore, this case is also reversed and remanded

[¶2] MILLER, Chief Justice, SABERS, KONENKAMP, and GILBERTSON, Justices, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vironment, 1999 SD 43 (S.D. 1999).

1999 SD 43 (Vironment) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yankton Ethanol, Inc. v. Vironment, Inc.
1999 SD 42 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1999)
Vironment, Inc. v. Light
1999 SD 43 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1999)