Virnetx Inc. v. Hirshfeld

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedApril 4, 2022
Docket17-2593
StatusUnpublished

This text of Virnetx Inc. v. Hirshfeld (Virnetx Inc. v. Hirshfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Virnetx Inc. v. Hirshfeld, (Fed. Cir. 2022).

Opinion

Case: 17-2593 Document: 65 Page: 1 Filed: 04/04/2022

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

VIRNETX INC., Appellant

v.

ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Intervenor ______________________

2017-2593 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016- 00693. -------------------------------------------------

ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Intervenor Case: 17-2593 Document: 65 Page: 2 Filed: 04/04/2022

______________________

2017-2594 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016- 00957. ______________________

Before PROST, REYNA, and CHEN, Circuit Judges. PROST, Circuit Judge. ORDER In response to this court’s September 16, 2021 and Feb- ruary 15, 2022 orders, the parties inform the court how they believe these appeals should proceed. In Appeal No. 2017-2594, VirnetX Inc. challenges the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s June 12, 2017 final writ- ten decision concerning claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,921,211. On August 1, 2019, this court issued its decision in VirnetX Inc. v. Apple Inc., 931 F.3d 1363, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2019), affirming separate Board decisions finding the same claims of the patent unpatentable. In light of that decision, the parties agree that Appeal No. 2017-2594 is moot and the underlying Board decision should be vacated. In Appeal No. 2017-2593, VirnetX informs the court that its request for Director review was denied and it has filed an amended notice of appeal. VirnetX further pro- poses a briefing schedule to which the intervenor does not object. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The above-captioned appeals are deconsolidated. The revised official captions are reflected above. Case: 17-2593 Document: 65 Page: 3 Filed: 04/04/2022

VIRNETX INC. v. HIRSHFELD 3

(2) The June 12, 2017 final written decision of the Pa- tent Trial and Appeal Board in IPR2016-00957 is vacated, and Appeal No. 2017-2594 is remanded with instructions to dismiss. (3) Each side to bear its own costs as to Appeal No. 2017-2594. (4) No additional docketing fee is required for the amended notice of appeal in Appeal No. 2017-2593. (5) The revised certified list in Appeal No. 2017-2593 is due no later than April 19, 2022. VirnetX’s opening brief is due within 60 days of the date of filing of the certified list. FOR THE COURT

April 4, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Virnetx Inc. v. Apple Inc.
931 F.3d 1363 (Federal Circuit, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Virnetx Inc. v. Hirshfeld, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/virnetx-inc-v-hirshfeld-cafc-2022.