Virnetx Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
This text of Virnetx Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (Virnetx Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
VIRNETX INC., Appellant
v.
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee ______________________
2019-1043 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,746. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
STEPHEN BLAKE KINNAIRD, Paul Hastings LLP, Wash- ington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by NAVEEN MODI, JOSEPH PALYS, IGOR VICTOR TIMOFEYEV, MICHAEL WOLFE, DANIEL ZEILBERGER.
ANDREW S. EHMKE, Haynes & Boone, LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by DAVID L. MCCOMBS, THEODORE M. FOSTER, DEBRA JANECE MCCOMAS. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 21, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Virnetx Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/virnetx-inc-v-cisco-systems-inc-cafc-2020.