Virnetx Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
VIRNETX INC., Appellant
v.
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee ______________________
2019-1043 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,746. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
STEPHEN BLAKE KINNAIRD, Paul Hastings LLP, Wash- ington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by NAVEEN MODI, JOSEPH PALYS, IGOR VICTOR TIMOFEYEV, MICHAEL WOLFE, DANIEL ZEILBERGER.
ANDREW S. EHMKE, Haynes & Boone, LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by DAVID L. MCCOMBS, THEODORE M. FOSTER, DEBRA JANECE MCCOMAS. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 21, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Virnetx Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (Virnetx Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.