Virnetx Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided January 15, 2019·No. 18-1197·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

VIRNETX INC., LEIDOS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant

APPLE INC., Defendant-Appellant ______________________

2018-1197 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 6:10-cv-00417-RWS, Judge Robert Schroeder, III. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JEFFREY A. LAMKEN, MoloLamken LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all plaintiffs-appellees. Plaintiff-appellee VirnetX Inc. also represented by JAMES A. BARTA, RAYINER HASHEM, MICHAEL GREGORY PATTILLO, JR .; ALLISON MILEO GORSUCH, New York, NY; BRADLEY WAYNE CALDWELL, JASON DODD C ASSADY, JOHN AUSTIN CURRY, Caldwell Cassady & Curry, Dallas, TX. DONALD SANTOS URRABAZO, Urrabazo Law, P.C., Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellee Leidos, Inc. Also represented by ANDY TINDEL, Mann, Tindel & Thompson, Tyler, TX.

WILLIAM F. LEE, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by REBECCA A. BACT, MARK CHRISTOPHER FLEMING, LAUREN B. FLETCHER; THOMAS GREGORY S PRANKLING, Palo Alto, CA; BRITTANY BLUEITT AMADI, Washington, DC. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER C URIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and REYNA , Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE C OURT

January 15, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Virnetx Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2019).

Virnetx Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (Virnetx Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.