Virguetti v. Maure-Juarez

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 25-80561-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

DENIS VIRGUETTI and TIFFANY VIRGUETTI,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ANDRES MAURE-JUAREZ and LAURENS M. WORKMAN, JR.,

Defendant. ___________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant’s August 21, 2025 Motion to Quash Service [DE 15], and the September 22, 2025 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart (the “Report”) [DE 19]. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 19] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 19] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 19] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report [DE 19] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. Defendant’s Motion to Quash Service [DE 15] is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiff shall effectuate proper service on ANDRES MAURE-JUAREZ by November 4, 2025. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of Defendant ANDRES MAURE-JUAREZ without prejudice. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida this 7th day of October, 2025.

: “4 if % f ? f tne i ye Zo #4 v Paty 4 ‘4 ase Af VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS United States District Judge Copies to: Counsel of record Magistrate Judge Hunt