Virginia v. Envtl. Prot. Agency

Supreme Court

Virginia v. Envtl. Prot. Agency

136 S. Ct. 1000, 194 L. Ed. 2d 17, 84 U.S.L.W. 3439, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 981

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedFebruary 9, 2016

DocketNo. 15A773.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 136 S. Ct. 1000 (Virginia v. Envtl. Prot. Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Virginia v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 136 S. Ct. 1000, 194 L. Ed. 2d 17, 84 U.S.L.W. 3439, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 981 (U.S. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Application for stay submitted to THE CHIEF JUSTICE and by him referred to the Court granted. The Environmental Protection Agency's "Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units," 80 Fed. Reg. 64,662 (October 23, 2015), is stayed pending disposition of the applicants' petitions for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and disposition of the applicants' petition for writ of certiorari, if such writ is sought. If writ of certiorari is sought and the Court denies the petition, this order shall terminate automatically. If the Court grants the petition for writ of certiorari, this order shall terminate when the Court enters its judgment.

Justice GINSBURG, Justice BREYER, Justice SOTOMAYOR, and Justice KAGAN would deny the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application for stay submitted to THE CHIEF JUSTICE and by him referred to the Court granted. The Environmental Protection Agency's "Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units," 80 Fed. Reg. 64,662 (October 23, 2015), is stayed pending disposition of the applicants' petitions for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and disposition of the applicants' petition for writ of certiorari, if such writ is sought. If writ of certiorari is sought and the Court denies the petition, this order shall terminate automatically. If the Court grants the petition for writ of certiorari, this order shall terminate when the Court enters its judgment.

Justice GINSBURG, Justice BREYER, Justice SOTOMAYOR, and Justice KAGAN would deny the application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 S. Ct. 1000, 194 L. Ed. 2d 17, 84 U.S.L.W. 3439, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/virginia-v-envtl-prot-agency-scotus-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack