Virginia Trust Co. v. Merrick

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Virginia Trust Co. v. Merrick

191 S.E. 5, 211 N.C. 739, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 204

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedApril 28, 1937

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 191 S.E. 5 (Virginia Trust Co. v. Merrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Virginia Trust Co. v. Merrick, 191 S.E. 5, 211 N.C. 739, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 204 (N.C. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

*740 Per Curiam.

One member of the Court, Schenck, J., being absent, and the remaining four being equally divided in opinion as to whether the statute permitting an administrator to execute a deed of trust on real estate is applicable to the facts in this case, the judgment of the Superior Court, in accord with the usual practice in such cases, is affirmed and stands as the decision of this case, without becoming a precedent. Caffey v. Osborne, 210 N. C., 252.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*740 Per Curiam.

One member of the Court, Schenck, J., being absent, and the remaining four being equally divided in opinion as to whether the statute permitting an administrator to execute a deed of trust on real estate is applicable to the facts in this case, the judgment of the Superior Court, in accord with the usual practice in such cases, is affirmed and stands as the decision of this case, without becoming a precedent. Caffey v. Osborne, 210 N. C., 252.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 S.E. 5, 211 N.C. 739, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/virginia-trust-co-v-merrick-nc-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack