Virginia Trust Co. v. Merrick
191 S.E. 5, 211 N.C. 739, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 204
Opinion
One member of the Court, Schenck, J., being absent, and the remaining four being equally divided in opinion as to whether the statute permitting an administrator to execute a deed of trust on real estate is applicable to the facts in this case, the judgment of the Superior Court, in accord with the usual practice in such cases, is affirmed and stands as the decision of this case, without becoming a precedent. Caffey v. Osborne, 210 N. C., 252.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Virginia Trust Co. v. Merrick, 191 S.E. 5, 211 N.C. 739, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 204 (N.C. 1937).
191 S.E. 5 (Virginia Trust Co. v. Merrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Southern Railway Co.
89 S.E.2d 860 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)