Virginia Trust Co. v. Green

168 S.E. 529, 204 N.C. 780, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 276
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 15, 1933·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pee Oueiam.

There was no error in the order consolidating this action with another action pending in the Superior Court of Craven County. In Fleming v. Holleman, 190 N. C., 449, 130 S. E., 171, it is said: “The object of consolidating two or more actions is to avoid a multiplicity of suits, to guard against oppression and abuse, to prevent delay, and especially to save unnecessary cost and expense; in short the attainment of justice with the least expense and vexation to the parties litigant. Consolidation, however, is improper, when the conduct of the cause will be embarrassed, or complications or prejudice will result, which will injuriously affect the rights of the parties.” In the instant case, the order of consolidation is supported by this principle.

An examination of the pleadings in this and in the action with which it was consolidated shows that there was no error in the order of reference. C. S., 573, subsection 5. The relief sought in both actions is equitable in its nature.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Virginia Trust Co. v. Green, 168 S.E. 529, 204 N.C. 780, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 276 (N.C. 1933).

168 S.E. 529 (Virginia Trust Co. v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peeples v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad
46 S.E.2d 649 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)
Kalte v. City of Lexington
197 S.E. 691 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)