Virginia Lumber Corp. v. Williamson Tie Co.

190 S.E. 202, 55 Ga. App. 410, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 112
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 5, 1937
Docket25877
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 190 S.E. 202 (Virginia Lumber Corp. v. Williamson Tie Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Virginia Lumber Corp. v. Williamson Tie Co., 190 S.E. 202, 55 Ga. App. 410, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 112 (Ga. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

Eelton, J.

1. Nine grounds of the motion for new trial, complaining of the admission of testimony, can not be considered by this court, for the reason that they do not show that the evidence was objected to at the time it was offered, or what the objections were. There is no merit in any of the other special grounds of the motion.

2. The order overruling the motion for new trial is as follows: “The within motion for new trial is hereby overruled.” Unless there is something in such order indicating that the judge did not exercise a discretion, it will be conclusively presumed that he did. Thompson v. Warren, 118 Ga. 664 (45 S. E. 912); Scribner v. Adams, 36 Ga. App. 754 (138 S. E. 264), and cit.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence. It had the approval of the trial judge, and will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. State
133 S.E.2d 436 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Neidlinger v. Mobley
42 S.E.2d 583 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 S.E. 202, 55 Ga. App. 410, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/virginia-lumber-corp-v-williamson-tie-co-gactapp-1937.