Virginia Eve Rollins and Robert Lee Rollins, Jr. v. Annie Pearl S. May
This text of 603 F.2d 487 (Virginia Eve Rollins and Robert Lee Rollins, Jr. v. Annie Pearl S. May) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this action for damages tried before a jury, the district court at the close of the evidence, granted the motion of the plaintiffs/appellees for directed verdict, finding (1) that the appellant had violated her fiduciary duty as trustee under the will of A. C. Stockman, by selling certain real estate and not reinvesting the proceeds in other real estate, as provided by the trust created under A. C. Stockman’s will, (2) that she was accordingly liable for damages to the *488 appellees, 1 ultímate beneficiaries under the will of their great grandfather A. C. Stock-man, and (3) that they were entitled as the measure of damages to recover the present day value of the real estate which had been sold. The district court further found that the appellant was estopped by judgment to raise the defense of the Rule Against Perpetuities.
The facts in this case cover a period from 1938 to 1978 and are long, involved and complicated. They are fully detailed in the opinion of the district court, 2 and will not be repeated here. After consideration of the record, briefs and oral arguments, we are of the opinion that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed upon the excellent and well-reasoned opinion of the district court.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
603 F.2d 487, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 12709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/virginia-eve-rollins-and-robert-lee-rollins-jr-v-annie-pearl-s-may-ca4-1979.