Virginia Electric and Power Company v. System Council No. U-1, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio, Virginia Electric and Power Company v. System Council No. U-1, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio

381 F.2d 379
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 18, 1967
Docket11300
StatusPublished

This text of 381 F.2d 379 (Virginia Electric and Power Company v. System Council No. U-1, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio, Virginia Electric and Power Company v. System Council No. U-1, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Virginia Electric and Power Company v. System Council No. U-1, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio, Virginia Electric and Power Company v. System Council No. U-1, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio, 381 F.2d 379 (4th Cir. 1967).

Opinion

381 F.2d 379

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
SYSTEM COUNCIL NO. U-1, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO, Appellee.
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY, Appellee,
v.
SYSTEM COUNCIL NO. U-1, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO, Appellant.

No. 11299.

No. 11300.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued June 22, 1967.

Decided July 18, 1967.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond; John D. Butzner, Jr., Judge.

Francis V. Lowden, Jr., Richmond, Va. (George D. Gibson and Paul M. Thompson, and Hunton, Williams, Gay, Powell & Gibson, Richmond, Va., on brief), for Virginia Electric & Power Co.

W. Cullen Mac Donald, Norfolk, Va. (Henry E. Howell, Jr., and Howell, Anninos & Daugherty, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for the Brotherhood.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BRYAN and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

For the reasons stated by him in open court, we think the District Judge properly ordered enforcement of the arbitrator's award, but denied an award of attorneys' fees to the Union. In this court, the case is in the same posture; the employer's contention is not so lacking in substance as to warrant our taxing to it the Union's attorneys' fees.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
381 F.2d 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/virginia-electric-and-power-company-v-system-council-no-u-1-ca4-1967.