Virginia Duncan v. Xavier Becerra

Ninth Circuit

Virginia Duncan v. Xavier Becerra

988 F.3d 1209

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 25, 2021

Docket19-55376

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 988 F.3d 1209 (Virginia Duncan v. Xavier Becerra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Virginia Duncan v. Xavier Becerra, 988 F.3d 1209 (9th Cir. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 25 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VIRGINIA DUNCAN; RICHARD LEWIS; No. 19-55376 PATRICK LOVETTE; DAVID MARGUGLIO; CHRISTOPHER D.C. No. WADDELL; CALIFORNIA RIFLE & 3:17-cv-01017-BEN-JLB PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., a California Southern District of California, corporation, San Diego

Plaintiffs-Appellees, ORDER

v.

XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California,

Defendant-Appellant.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Judges Owens and Bress did not participate in the deliberations or vote in

this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI