Virginia Dailey and John W. Dailey v. Audrey Adickes Thorpe
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-13-00492-CV Style: Virginia Dailey and John W. Dailey v. Audrey Adickes Thorpe
Date motion filed*: November 12, 2013 Type of motion: Appellants’ request for extension to file appellants’ brief Party filing motion: Appellants Document to be filed: Appellants’ brief
Is appeal accelerated? No
If motion to extend time: Original due date: October 9, 2013 Number of previous extensions granted: 1 Current Due date: November 12, 2013 Date Requested: None
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: December 12, 2013 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time. Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ On November 5, 2013, appellee, Audrey Adickes Thorpe, filed an “Objection to Appellants’ Motion to Extend Time to File Brief.” On November 12, 2013, appellants, Virginia Dailey and John W. Dailey, filed a response to Appellees’ objection in which they request this Court to “grant this Motion to Extend Time to File Appellants’ Brief” and extend the time to file their brief. Accordingly, we grant appellants’ request to extend the time to file their appellants’ brief in this appeal.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Jim Sharp
Panel consists of ____________________________________________
Date: November 26, 2013
November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Virginia Dailey and John W. Dailey v. Audrey Adickes Thorpe (Virginia Dailey and John W. Dailey v. Audrey Adickes Thorpe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.