Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Rachels

152 S.E. 308, 41 Ga. App. 221, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 506
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 28, 1930·No. 19670·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. The chose in action sued on, being one involving a property right, was assignable. Sullivan v. Curling, 149 Ga. 96 (99 S. E. 533, 5 A. L. R. 124).

2. It appearing from the allegations in the petition that the title to the alleged chose in action sued on (a right of action against the defendant for a trespass upon real estate by cutting and removing therefrom growing timber) was, at the time of the filing of the suit, not in the plaintiff, the Virginia-Carolina Chemical Company, but in another as the plaintiff's assignee, viz. the Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corporation, which was not a party plaintiff, the suit could not" be maintained by the plaintiff, the Virginia-Carolina Chemical Company, for the use of the Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corporation, the assignee. Sullivan v. Curling, supra. The demurrer to the petition, upon the ground that it appeared that the plaintiff had no title to the chose in action sued on, was properly sustained.

3. The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the petition. Judgment affirmed.

Jenhins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Rachels, 152 S.E. 308, 41 Ga. App. 221, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 506 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

152 S.E. 308 (Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Rachels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reserve Life Insurance v. Peavy
93 S.E.2d 580 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Browder v. Cox
64 S.E.2d 460 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Hoxie v. Americus Automobile Company
37 S.E.2d 808 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)
Lumpkin v. American Surety Company
7 S.E.2d 687 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Trulock v. Lamb
157 S.E. 100 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)