Virgin v. Nichols

539 So. 2d 200, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 631, 1988 WL 142751
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 2, 1988
Docket87-199, 87-263
StatusPublished

This text of 539 So. 2d 200 (Virgin v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Virgin v. Nichols, 539 So. 2d 200, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 631, 1988 WL 142751 (Ala. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William Virgin, as executor of his deceased wife’s estate, appeals from the adverse portions of a final judgment in favor of the children, as the contingent remain-dermen under their deceased mother’s will. The children cross-appeal from certain portions of the judgment in favor of their father. We have studied the trial court’s detailed findings and conclusions in regard to each of the parties’ allegations of error, and we find no basis for reversal.

AFFIRMED AS TO THE APPEAL.

AFFIRMED AS TO THE CROSS-APPEAL.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
539 So. 2d 200, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 631, 1988 WL 142751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/virgin-v-nichols-ala-1988.