Virgin v. Nichols
This text of 539 So. 2d 200 (Virgin v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William Virgin, as executor of his deceased wife’s estate, appeals from the adverse portions of a final judgment in favor of the children, as the contingent remain-dermen under their deceased mother’s will. The children cross-appeal from certain portions of the judgment in favor of their father. We have studied the trial court’s detailed findings and conclusions in regard to each of the parties’ allegations of error, and we find no basis for reversal.
AFFIRMED AS TO THE APPEAL.
AFFIRMED AS TO THE CROSS-APPEAL.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
539 So. 2d 200, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 631, 1988 WL 142751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/virgin-v-nichols-ala-1988.