Virgin v. Nichols

Supreme Court of Alabama

Virgin v. Nichols

539 So. 2d 200, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 631, 1988 WL 142751

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 2, 1988·No. 87-199, 87-263·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William Virgin, as executor of his deceased wife’s estate, appeals from the adverse portions of a final judgment in favor of the children, as the contingent remain-dermen under their deceased mother’s will. The children cross-appeal from certain portions of the judgment in favor of their father. We have studied the trial court’s detailed findings and conclusions in regard to each of the parties’ allegations of error, and we find no basis for reversal.

AFFIRMED AS TO THE APPEAL.

AFFIRMED AS TO THE CROSS-APPEAL.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

William Virgin, as executor of his deceased wife’s estate, appeals from the adverse portions of a final judgment in favor of the children, as the contingent remain-dermen under their deceased mother’s will. The children cross-appeal from certain portions of the judgment in favor of their father. We have studied the trial court’s detailed findings and conclusions in regard to each of the parties’ allegations of error, and we find no basis for reversal.

AFFIRMED AS TO THE APPEAL.

AFFIRMED AS TO THE CROSS-APPEAL.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Virgin v. Nichols, 539 So. 2d 200, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 631, 1988 WL 142751 (Ala. 1988).

Pincite

539 So. 2d 200 (Virgin v. Nichols) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.