Virgin v. Hermanny

199 Ill. App. 189
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedApril 17, 1916
StatusPublished

This text of 199 Ill. App. 189 (Virgin v. Hermanny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Virgin v. Hermanny, 199 Ill. App. 189 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Mr. Justice McBride

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Evidence, § 244*—when copy of decree in prior case admissible in evidence. In order that a paper purporting to he a decree in a pri- or case may become admissible in evidence as a copy of such decree, it is necessary that such copy be certified to under the seal of the clerk of the court, as provided by Rev. St. ch. 51, sec. 13 (J. & A. H 5530). 3. Appeal and ebbob, § 948*—when error in failure of clerk to certify to record in another case offered in evidence not cured. Where a bill of exceptions signed by the trial judge contains a purported decree in another case which is offered in evidence without the certificate of the clerk as provided by law, the clerk cannot cure the error by filing a supplemental record containing the same decree with the addition of such certificate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 Ill. App. 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/virgin-v-hermanny-illappct-1916.