Virgin v. AL LOCKHART

702 S.W.2d 9, 288 Ark. 92, 1986 Ark. LEXIS 1723
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided January 21, 1986·No. 85-223·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant who is an inmate of the Arkansas Department of Correction sought a writ of mandamus from the circuit court to compel the Department to reassess his parole eligibility status. The circuit court denied the petition and the record has now been lodged on appeal. We denied appellant’s first motion for appointment of counsel in this appeal because he stated no grounds. He has filed a motion to reconsider, contending that he has a right to counsel.

In criminal cases the accused has a constitutional right to counsel at trial. There is no corresponding right to counsel in a postconviction proceeding, Dyer v. State, 258 Ark. 494, 527 S.W.2d 622 (1975), or in a civil action. See Peterson v. Nadler, 452 F.2d 754 (8th Cir.1971); see also Johnson v. Teasdale, 456 F. Supp. 1083 (W. D. Mo. 1978). Since a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the computation of parole eligibility is a civil action, neither the circuit court nor this Court is obligated to provide an attorney to perfect an appeal if the petition is denied.

In those cases where the appellant is able to make a substantial showing that he is entitled to relief and that he cannot proceed without counsel, however, we will appoint an attorney on appeal. Appellant here has not established that the circumstances of his case require appointment of counsel.

Motion denied.

Purtle, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Virgin v. AL LOCKHART, 702 S.W.2d 9, 288 Ark. 92, 1986 Ark. LEXIS 1723 (Ark. 1986).

702 S.W.2d 9 (Virgin v. AL LOCKHART) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reginald Early v. State of Arkansas
2021 Ark. 221 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2021)
Biggs v. State
2014 Ark. 114 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2014)
Hardin v. State
86 S.W.3d 384 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2002)
Martin v. State
13 S.W.3d 576 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2000)
Miner v. Furman
887 S.W.2d 310 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1994)
Mixon v. State
887 S.W.2d 307 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1994)
Maxie v. Gaines
876 S.W.2d 572 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1994)
Howard v. Lockhart
777 S.W.2d 223 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1989)
Patterson v. Smith
712 S.W.2d 922 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1986)
Glick v. Lockhart
706 S.W.2d 178 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1986)
Hayes v. Lockhart
706 S.W.2d 179 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1986)