Virgin Scent, Inc. v. Sandler and Travis, P.A., P.C.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedMarch 23, 2023
Docket1:23-cv-02440
StatusUnknown

This text of Virgin Scent, Inc. v. Sandler and Travis, P.A., P.C. (Virgin Scent, Inc. v. Sandler and Travis, P.A., P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Virgin Scent, Inc. v. Sandler and Travis, P.A., P.C., (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATE FILED: 03/23/ 2023 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------- X VIRGIN SCENT, INC., doing business as : ARTNATURALS, : : Plaintiff, : -against- : 23-CV-2440 (VEC) : : ORDER SANDLER AND TRAVIS, P.A., P.C. AND DOES : 1–10, : : Defendants. : -------------------------------------------------------------- X VALERIE CAPRONI, United States District Judge: WHEREAS on March 22, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Sandler and Travis, P.A., P.C. (“Sandler and Travis”) and Does 1–10; Compl., Dkt. 1; WHEREAS Plaintiff alleges that the Court’s subject-matter jurisdiction is premised on diversity, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2), id. ¶ 17; WHEREAS the citizenship of a corporation for diversity purposes is determined by the corporation’s place of incorporation and principal place of business, see In re Balfour MacLaine Int’l Ltd., 85 F.3d 68, 76 (2d Cir. 1996); WHEREAS the citizenship of an unincorporated association for diversity purposes is determined by “the citizenship of each and every member of that association,” Jaser v. N.Y. Prop. Ins. Underwriting Ass’n, 815 F.2d 240, 242 (2d Cir. 1987); see also Americold Realty Trust v. Conagara Foods, Inc., 577 U.S. 378, 381 (2016); WHEREAS Plaintiff must affirmatively plead facts establishing each party’s citizenship, including the citizenship of any unincorporated party’s members or partners, see Prospect Funding Holdings, LLC v. Fennell, No. 15-CV-4176 (LLS), 2015 WL 4477120, at *1—2 (S.D.N.Y. July 15, 2015) (collecting cases); WHEREAS Plaintiff alleges that Sandler and Travis is a “professional association and law firm” organized under the laws of Florida with a principal place of business in New York and with partners residing in, “among other places,” New York, Compl. § 14; and WHEREAS the case caption in the Complaint identifies Sandler and Travis both as a “professional association” and as a “professional corporation” but the Complaint does not clearly allege whether, for purposes of diversity jurisdiction, Sandler and Travis is an association or a corporation, id. at 1; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that not later than Thursday, March 30, 2023, Plaintiff must file a memorandum of law explaining the basis for its contention that the Court has subject- matter jurisdiction based on diversity. SO ORDERED. . “ Vedi oe Date: March 23, 2023 VALERIE CAPRONI New York, New York United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Virgin Scent, Inc. v. Sandler and Travis, P.A., P.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/virgin-scent-inc-v-sandler-and-travis-pa-pc-nysd-2023.