Virgil v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co.
This text of 520 So. 2d 1259 (Virgil v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This case is before us on a remand order1 from the Louisiana Supreme Court. Virgil v. Amer. Guarantee & Liability Ins., 514 So.2d 1169 (La.1987). The November 20, 1987 order requires that the case “be argued before a panel of at least five judges. See La. Const, art. 5 section 8(B).” Id. We now render an opinion in conformity with the order.
The facts of this worker’s compensation claim are clearly set forth in both the ma[1260]*1260jority and concurring and dissenting opinions previously rendered by this court in Virgil v. Amer. Guarantee & Liability Ins., 503 So.2d 45 (La.App. 5th Cir.1987) and Virgil v. Amer. Guarantee & Liability Ins., 512 So.2d 1235 (La.App. 5th Cir.1987).
After a reconsideration of the case we now adopt the concurring and dissenting opinion in Virgil v. Amer. Guarantee & Liability Ins., 512 So.2d 1235 (La.App. 5th Cir.1987) (Wicker, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) as our majority opinion. Accordingly, following the earlier mandate of the Louisiana Supreme Court to review the record in light of the manifest error standard, Virgil v. Amer. Guarantee & Liability Ins., 507 So.2d 825 (La.1987), and finding no manifest error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
AFFIRMED.
KLIEBERT, DUFRESNE and GOTHARD, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
520 So. 2d 1259, 1988 La. App. LEXIS 294, 1988 WL 9308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/virgil-v-american-guarantee-liability-insurance-co-lactapp-1988.