Virgil v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co.

520 So. 2d 1259, 1988 La. App. LEXIS 294, 1988 WL 9308
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedFebruary 8, 1988
DocketNo. 86-CA-446
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 520 So. 2d 1259 (Virgil v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Virgil v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co., 520 So. 2d 1259, 1988 La. App. LEXIS 294, 1988 WL 9308 (La. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinions

WICKER, Judge.

This case is before us on a remand order1 from the Louisiana Supreme Court. Virgil v. Amer. Guarantee & Liability Ins., 514 So.2d 1169 (La.1987). The November 20, 1987 order requires that the case “be argued before a panel of at least five judges. See La. Const, art. 5 section 8(B).” Id. We now render an opinion in conformity with the order.

The facts of this worker’s compensation claim are clearly set forth in both the ma[1260]*1260jority and concurring and dissenting opinions previously rendered by this court in Virgil v. Amer. Guarantee & Liability Ins., 503 So.2d 45 (La.App. 5th Cir.1987) and Virgil v. Amer. Guarantee & Liability Ins., 512 So.2d 1235 (La.App. 5th Cir.1987).

After a reconsideration of the case we now adopt the concurring and dissenting opinion in Virgil v. Amer. Guarantee & Liability Ins., 512 So.2d 1235 (La.App. 5th Cir.1987) (Wicker, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) as our majority opinion. Accordingly, following the earlier mandate of the Louisiana Supreme Court to review the record in light of the manifest error standard, Virgil v. Amer. Guarantee & Liability Ins., 507 So.2d 825 (La.1987), and finding no manifest error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

AFFIRMED.

KLIEBERT, DUFRESNE and GOTHARD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ricaud v. Holloway Sportswear, Inc.
741 So. 2d 124 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1999)
Mack v. River Oaks Psychiatric Hospital
646 So. 2d 1082 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1994)
Bourque v. Riviana Foods, Inc.
611 So. 2d 669 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1992)
Farque v. McKinney
576 So. 2d 1191 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1991)
France v. a & M WOOD CO.
566 So. 2d 106 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
520 So. 2d 1259, 1988 La. App. LEXIS 294, 1988 WL 9308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/virgil-v-american-guarantee-liability-insurance-co-lactapp-1988.