Virgil v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co.
Opinions
This case is before us on a remand order1 from the Louisiana Supreme Court. Virgil v. Amer. Guarantee & Liability Ins., 514 So.2d 1169 (La.1987). The November 20, 1987 order requires that the case “be argued before a panel of at least five judges. See La. Const, art. 5 section 8(B).” Id. We now render an opinion in conformity with the order.
The facts of this worker’s compensation claim are clearly set forth in both the ma[1260] jority and concurring and dissenting opinions previously rendered by this court in Virgil v. Amer. Guarantee & Liability Ins., 503 So.2d 45 (La.App. 5th Cir.1987) and Virgil v. Amer. Guarantee & Liability Ins., 512 So.2d 1235 (La.App. 5th Cir.1987).
After a reconsideration of the case we now adopt the concurring and dissenting opinion in Virgil v. Amer. Guarantee & Liability Ins., 512 So.2d 1235 (La.App. 5th Cir.1987) (Wicker, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) as our majority opinion. Accordingly, following the earlier mandate of the Louisiana Supreme Court to review the record in light of the manifest error standard, Virgil v. Amer. Guarantee & Liability Ins., 507 So.2d 825 (La.1987), and finding no manifest error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
AFFIRMED.
KLIEBERT, DUFRESNE and GOTHARD, JJ., concur.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
520 So. 2d 1259 (Virgil v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.