Virgil Leroy Aikins v. United States

472 F.2d 1380
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 12, 1973
Docket72-1982
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 472 F.2d 1380 (Virgil Leroy Aikins v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Virgil Leroy Aikins v. United States, 472 F.2d 1380 (9th Cir. 1973).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The place of appellant’s arrest is immaterial. The cause is remanded to the district court for the purpose of conducting an evidentiary hearing limited to the issue: Was the offense to which appellant pleaded guilty committed within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States?

The district court shall appoint counsel to represent the appellant in said hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Virgil Leroy Aikins v. United States
530 F.2d 1330 (Ninth Circuit, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
472 F.2d 1380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/virgil-leroy-aikins-v-united-states-ca9-1973.