Virgil James Lackey v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 21, 2017·No. 01-16-00986-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-16-00986-CR & 01-16-00987-CR Style: Virgil James Lackey v State of Texas Date motion filed*: December 8, 2017 Type of motion: Motion to Withdraw as Counsel Party filing motion: Lana Gordon Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: Number of previous extensions granted: 0 Current Due date: Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ Lana Gordon’s motion to withdraw as counsel for appellant is denied for failure to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5 and 48.4. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5, 48.4.

Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: December 21, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Virgil James Lackey v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Virgil James Lackey v. State (Virgil James Lackey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.