Virgil G. Lawson v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

Fifth Circuit

Virgil G. Lawson v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

491 F.2d 1100, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 9413

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 29, 1974·No. 73-3548·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lawson, a prisoner of the State of Texas, appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for federal habeas corpus. Because the record before this Court shows that the courts of Texas have never adjudicated the merits of the appellant’s habeas grounds, we believe that the court below should have pretermitted decision until state remedies were exhausted. We therefore vacate the judgment appealed from and remand this cause to the district court with directions to dismiss the appellant’s habeas petition without prejudice to his right to reapply after pursuing his remedies under Art. 11.07, Vernon’s Ann. *1101 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. 1 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b); Redd v. Louisiana, 5th Cir. 1973, 489 F.2d 766; Kirby v. Beto, 5th Cir. 1973, 472 F.2d 167.

Vacated and remanded.

1

. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 9 (c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Lawson, a prisoner of the State of Texas, appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for federal habeas corpus. Because the record before this Court shows that the courts of Texas have never adjudicated the merits of the appellant’s habeas grounds, we believe that the court below should have pretermitted decision until state remedies were exhausted. We therefore vacate the judgment appealed from and remand this cause to the district court with directions to dismiss the appellant’s habeas petition without prejudice to his right to reapply after pursuing his remedies under Art. 11.07, Vernon’s Ann. *1101 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. 1 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b); Redd v. Louisiana, 5th Cir. 1973, 489 F.2d 766; Kirby v. Beto, 5th Cir. 1973, 472 F.2d 167.

Vacated and remanded.

1

. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 9 (c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.

Virgil G. Lawson v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, 491 F.2d 1100, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 9413 (5th Cir. 1974).

Pincite

491 F.2d 1100 (Virgil G. Lawson v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related