Virgil E. Bailey v. Harmon Mining Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

Fourth Circuit

Virgil E. Bailey v. Harmon Mining Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

54 F.3d 772, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17396, 1995 WL 308826

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 19, 1995

Docket95-1286

StatusPublished

This text of 54 F.3d 772 (Virgil E. Bailey v. Harmon Mining Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Virgil E. Bailey v. Harmon Mining Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, 54 F.3d 772, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17396, 1995 WL 308826 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

54 F.3d 772
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Virgil E. BAILEY, Petitioner,
v.
HARMON MINING COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS'
COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
LABOR, Respondents.

No. 95-1286.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 18, 1995.
Decided: May 19, 1995.

Virgil E. Bailey, Petitioner Pro Se. Mark Elliott Solomons, Laura Metcoff Klaus, Arter & Hadden, Washington, DC; Patricia May Nece, Cathryn Celeste Helm, United States Department of Labor, Washington, DC, for Respondents.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. Secs. 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1994). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Bailey v. Harmon Mining Co., No. 94-3684-BLA (B.R.B. Jan. 30, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

54 F.3d 772
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Virgil E. BAILEY, Petitioner,
v.
HARMON MINING COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS'
COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
LABOR, Respondents.

No. 95-1286.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 18, 1995.
Decided: May 19, 1995.

Virgil E. Bailey, Petitioner Pro Se. Mark Elliott Solomons, Laura Metcoff Klaus, Arter & Hadden, Washington, DC; Patricia May Nece, Cathryn Celeste Helm, United States Department of Labor, Washington, DC, for Respondents.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. Secs. 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1994). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Bailey v. Harmon Mining Co., No. 94-3684-BLA (B.R.B. Jan. 30, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 F.3d 772, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17396, 1995 WL 308826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/virgil-e-bailey-v-harmon-mining-company-director-o-ca4-1995.