Virdin's Administrator v. Polk's Administrator

1 Del. Cas. 444
CourtSupreme Court of Delaware
DecidedOctober 15, 1797
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Del. Cas. 444 (Virdin's Administrator v. Polk's Administrator) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Virdin's Administrator v. Polk's Administrator, 1 Del. Cas. 444 (Del. 1797).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have never had any doubt of the right of a creditor to apply any money paid to him to the payment of the interest due at the time, whether the year be expired or not. A creditor is not bound to receive a partial payment. If he does, it is a favor or accommodation to the debtor, and the creditor must not be put in a worse situation than if the whole debt had been paid. We consider that interest accrues and is due from day to day, and therefore that a creditor has a strict right to pay the interest accrued in the first place, at any time when a payment is made. And we apprehend the case is the same where interest is reserved and payments are made before the principal is due.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Agostini v. Colonial Trust Co.
36 A.2d 33 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Del. Cas. 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/virdins-administrator-v-polks-administrator-del-1797.