Virdin's Administrator v. Polk's Administrator

1 Del. Cas. 444
Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided October 15, 1797·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have never had any doubt of the right of a creditor to apply any money paid to him to the payment of the interest due at the time, whether the year be expired or not. A creditor is not bound to receive a partial payment. If he does, it is a favor or accommodation to the debtor, and the creditor must not be put in a worse situation than if the whole debt had been paid. We consider that interest accrues and is due from day to day, and therefore that a creditor has a strict right to pay the interest accrued in the first place, at any time when a payment is made. And we apprehend the case is the same where interest is reserved and payments are made before the principal is due.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Virdin's Administrator v. Polk's Administrator, 1 Del. Cas. 444 (Del. 1797).

1 Del. Cas. 444 (Virdin's Administrator v. Polk's Administrator) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Agostini v. Colonial Trust Co.
36 A.2d 33 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1944)