Virden v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Virden v. State

164 S.E. 492, 45 Ga. App. 367, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 324

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 15, 1932

Docket22310

StatusPublished

This text of 164 S.E. 492 (Virden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Virden v. State, 164 S.E. 492, 45 Ga. App. 367, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 324 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Bboyles, O. J.

1. No constitutional question is raised by special ground 1 of the motion for a new trial, as it is not alleged therein what particular provision of the constitution, Federal or State, was violated.

2. The remaining special grounds of the motion for a new trial are not argued or insisted upon in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error and therefore are treated as abandoned.

3. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concwi’S. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness. B. E. Maury, for plaintiff in error. Franh B. Willingham, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI