Viral DRM, LLC v. Hardee Broadcasting LLC

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedMarch 19, 2024
Docket8:23-cv-02628
StatusUnknown

This text of Viral DRM, LLC v. Hardee Broadcasting LLC (Viral DRM, LLC v. Hardee Broadcasting LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Viral DRM, LLC v. Hardee Broadcasting LLC, (M.D. Fla. 2024).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

VIRAL DRM, LLC

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 8:23-cv-2628-TPB-NHA

HARDEE BROADCASTING LLC,

Defendant. _______________________________________/

ORDER On November 16, 2023, Plaintiff Viral DRM, LLC initiated this copyright infringement action under 17 U.S.C. § 101 et. seq against Defendant Hardee Broadcasting, LLC. Doc. 1. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant, without permission or authorization, actively copied and displayed video footage of a tornado, to which Plaintiff owns the rights and licenses. Id. Plaintiff has repeatedly and unsuccessfully attempted to serve Defendant in the traditional manner delineated in the Federal Rules and Florida Statutes, and now asks for leave to amend the manner and time for service. Doc. 11. The Court grants, in part, Plaintiff’s “Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Specifically Enlargement of Time to Serve and Alternate Service” (Doc. 11). Background Pursuant to Florida Statutes, section 605.0113, each limited liability

company (“LLC”) must file with the state of Florida the identity and address of its registered agent. If the registered agent changes his name or address, the registered agent “shall promptly furnish notice of the statement of change.” Fla. Stat. Ann. § 605.0116.

Records of the Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations, show that Defendant designated John Mullis as its registered agent on February 22, 2017, and identified 1325 Shepard Road, Lakeland, Florida 33811 as his address on April 20, 2018.1 Doc. 11-2, p. 1. Mr. Mullis, as the

registered agent, is the only party listed on Defendant’s most recent annual report, which was filed on March 1, 2022. Id., p. 3. To serve the Defendant in this case, Plaintiff engaged a process server who attempted to serve Mr. Mullis on November 27 and November 29, 2023,

at the Shepherd Road address. Doc. 11, p. 3. Id. On the latter attempt, the current resident at the address notified the process server that Mr. Mullis had

1 Federal Rule of Evidence 201 permits courts to take judicial notice of “a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute because it[ ] ... can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.” Fed. R. Evid. 201(b). “The court may take judicial notice at any stage of the proceeding.” Fed. R. Evid. 201(d). moved in 2021. Doc. 11-3, p. 1 Defendant has not furnished notice of the address change to the state. Doc. 11-2, p. 1.

Plaintiff conducted an “exhaustive search” of the internet and found Defendant’s principal address to be 1310 South Florida Avenue, Wauchula, Florida 33873. Doc. 11, p. 3. The process server attempted to serve Mr. Mullis at this address on January 1, 2024. Doc. 11, p. 2. The process server spoke to

Defendant’s employee, Carlos, who stated that Mr. Mullis was the only officer or manager for the company and was experiencing health issues and not in the office. Id. On January 22, 2024, the process server again attempted to serve Mr.

Mullis at the Florida Avenue address and spoke with Carlos. Id. Carlos stated that Mr. Mullis was not in the office and Carlos believed that Mr. Mullis had been admitted to Tampa General Hospital. Id. After these four failed service attempts, Plaintiff searched for alternate

physical addresses for Mr. Mullis. Doc. 11, p. 3. It found none. Id. Plaintiff did, however, find electronic addresses for Defendant. Specifically, Plaintiff submits a business records search indicating that Defendant’s website domain is wauc1310.com. Doc. 11-4. Plaintiff provides images of Defendant’s website

which states that the website “is a service of Hardee Broadcasting LLC” and lists the Defendant’s address as 1310 South Florida Avenue, Wauchula, Florida 33873. Doc. 11-5, p. 1. The website also provides two contact email addresses: 1021theoutlaw@gmail.com and 1310wauc@gmail.com. Id., pp. 1, 6.

Plaintiff now moves for leave to serve Defendant by both electronic and regular mail, and to extend the time Plaintiff has to effect service. Id., pp. 6-7. Specifically, Plaintiff asks the Court allow it to serve Defendant by sending the summons, complaint, and civil cover sheet via email to the

1021theoutlaw@gmail.com and 1310wauc@gmail.com addresses and via mail to Defendant’s 1310 South Florida Avenue, Wauchula Florida 33873 address. Doc. 11, pp. 6-8. Analysis

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(h)(1) governs the service of process on United States corporations, partnerships, and unincorporated associations, and applies to service on limited liability companies (LLCs). See Fitzpatrick v. Bank of New York Mellon, 580 F. App’x 690, 693 (11th Cir. 2014) (applying 4(h)

to an LLC). It provides that service may be made “by delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to an officer, a managing or general agent, or any other agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1)(B). An LLC may also be served by following

state law in which the district court is located or in which service is effected. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1)(A), 4(e)(1). Section 48.062 of the Florida Statutes governs service of process on LLCs in Florida. That statute sets forth a hierarchy of persons who may accept

service on an LLC’s behalf. Subsection (2) directs plaintiffs to first attempt service on the LLC’s registered agent. Fla. Stat. Ann. § 48.062(2). “Every . . . domestic limited liability company . . . shall cause the designated registered agent to keep the designated registered office open from at least 10 a.m. to 12

noon each day except Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, and shall cause the designated registered agent to keep one or more individuals who are, or are representatives of, the designated registered agent on whom process may be served at the office during these hours.” Fla. Stat. Ann. § 48.091.

“If service cannot be made on a registered agent of the domestic limited liability company. . ., the process may be served on any of the following:” (a) Any manager of a manager-managed domestic limited liability company. . .,

(b) Any member of a member-managed domestic limited liability company. . .,

(c) Any person listed publicly by the domestic limited liability company . . . on its latest annual report, as most recently amended.

Fla. Stat. Ann. § 48.062(3). If, after due diligence, the process cannot be completed under subsection (2) and if either: (a) The only person listed publicly by the domestic limited liability company . . . on its latest annual report, as most recently amended, is also the registered agent on whom service was attempted under subsection (2); or

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ronald Fitzpatrick v. The Bank of New York Mellon
580 F. App'x 690 (Eleventh Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Viral DRM, LLC v. Hardee Broadcasting LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/viral-drm-llc-v-hardee-broadcasting-llc-flmd-2024.