Viox v. Dist. Ct. (Lowe)
This text of Viox v. Dist. Ct. (Lowe) (Viox v. Dist. Ct. (Lowe)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
deny the petition. Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). It is so ORDERED. 2
/ O_A c.ettAtt, , C.J. Hardesty
e ;,4074' J. Douglas
, J. Cherry
cc: Hon. Nancy L. Porter, District Judge Charles Dean Viox Attorney General/Carson City David D. Loreman Gary D. Woodbury Elko County District Attorney Troy Curtis Jordan Elko County Clerk
2 The clerk of this court shall file the following documents that petitioner submitted to this court: opposition to enlargement of time, motion to compel or show cause, and motion for mental examination, which were provisionally received on December 22, 2014, January 2, 2015, and January 21, 2015, respectively. We deny all requests for relief contained in those documents. Petitioner's November 19, 2014, motion to compel judgment as a matter of law is likewise denied.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A le
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Viox v. Dist. Ct. (Lowe), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/viox-v-dist-ct-lowe-nev-2015.